Tutorial: Removing Fields

Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.

— Antoine de Saint-Exupery

When working on WishfulShrinking, you will most likely find that some features and fields that are no longer necessary. In scenarios like this, you can consider refactoring the existing Recipe model to suit your use case.

In this tutorial, we’ll do exactly just that and remove the address field from Recipe.

• Safely deleting Address
  • Assisted refactoring
  • Manual refactoring
• Tidying up

Safely deleting Address

Fortunately, IntelliJ IDEA provides a robust refactoring tool that can identify most usages. Let’s try to use it as much as we can.

Assisted refactoring

The address field in Recipe is actually an instance of the seedu.address.model.recipe.Address class. Since removing the Address class will break the application, we start by identifying Address’s usages. This allows us to see code that depends on Address to function properly and edit them on a case-by-case basis. Right-click the Address class and select Refactor > Safe Delete through the menu.

Choose to View Usages and you should be presented with a list of Safe Delete Conflicts. These conflicts describe locations in which the Address class is used.

Remove usages of Address by performing Safe Deletes on each entry. You will need to exercise discretion when removing usages of Address. Functions like ParserUtil#parseAddress() can be safely removed but its usages must be removed as well. Other usages like in EditRecipeDescriptor may require more careful inspection.

Let’s try removing references to Address in EditRecipeDescriptor.

1. Safe delete the field address in EditRecipeDescriptor.

2. Select Yes when prompted to remove getters and setters.

3. Select View Usages again.
   

4. Remove the usages of address and select Do refactor when you are done.

   Tip: Removing usages may result in errors. Exercise discretion and fix them. For example, removing the address field from the Recipe class will require you to modify its constructor.

5. Repeat the steps for the remaining usages of Address

After you are done, verify that the application still works by compiling and running it again.

Manual refactoring

Unfortunately, there are usages of Address that IntelliJ IDEA cannot identify. You can find them by searching for instances of the word address in your code (Edit > Find > Find in path).

Places of interest to look out for would be resources used by the application. main/resources contains images and fxml files used by the application and test/resources contains test data. For example, there is a $address in each RecipeCard that has not been removed nor identified.

A quick look at the RecipeCard class and its fxml file quickly reveals why it slipped past the automated refactoring.

RecipeCard.java

...
@FXML
private Label address;
...

RecipeCard.fxml

...
<Label fx:id="ingredients" styleClass="cell_small_label" text="\$ingredients" />
...

After removing the Label, we can proceed to formally test our code. If everything went well, you should have most of your tests pass. Fix any remaining errors until the tests all pass.

Tidying up

At this point, your application is working as intended and all your tests are passing. What’s left to do is to clean up references to Address in test data and documentation.

In src/test/data/, data meant for testing purposes are stored. While keeping the address field in the json files does not cause the tests to fail, it is not good practice to let cruft from old features accumulate.

invalidRecipeWishfulShrinking.json:

{
  "recipes": [ {
    "name": "Recipe with invalid name field: Ha!ns Mu@ster",
    "ingredients": "9482424"
  } ]
}

You can go through each individual json file and manually remove the address field.